Learning to perform accurate and rich simulations of human driving behaviors from data for autonomous vehicle testing remains challenging due to human driving styles' high diversity and variance. We address this challenge by proposing a novel approach that leverages contrastive learning to extract a dictionary of driving styles from pre-existing human driving data. We discretize these styles with quantization, and the styles are used to learn a conditional diffusion policy for simulating human drivers. Our empirical evaluation confirms that the behaviors generated by our approach are both safer and more human-like than those of the machine-learning-based baseline methods. We believe this has the potential to enable higher realism and more effective techniques for evaluating and improving the performance of autonomous vehicles.

Predicting the future trajectories of surrounding traffic participants plays an essential role in automated driving. By anticipating future movements of nearby agents, such as vehicles and vulnerable road users, an automated vehicle (AV) can better plan maneuvers, reduce the risk of collisions, and ensure smoother interactions with other road users. Although existing approaches, e.g., [1-3], effectively predict the future movements of individual traffic participants, they limit an AV to a reactive planning strategy, assuming that the predictions of surrounding vehicles remain unaffected by the AV's planned actions. In highly interactive situations, this often leads to the freezing robot problem [4], where the AV, unable to engage in cooperative planning, simply stops to avoid potential collisions. For example, when it is unable to merge in dense traffic because the predictions of surrounding vehicles do not react to the AV's plan. One approach to resolving this is to condition the prediction on the AV's plan, often referred to as conditional inference [5].

Handling pre-crash scenarios is still a major challenge for self-driving cars due to limited practical data and human-driving behavior datasets. We introduce DISC (Driving Styles In Simulated Crashes), one of the first datasets designed to capture various driving styles and behaviors in pre-crash scenarios for mixed autonomy analysis. DISC includes over 8 classes of driving styles/behaviors from hundreds of drivers navigating a simulated vehicle through a virtual city, encountering rare-event traffic scenarios. This dataset enables the classification of pre-crash human driving behaviors in unsafe conditions, supporting individualized trajectory prediction based on observed driving patterns. By utilizing a custom-designed VR-based in-house driving simulator, TRAVERSE, data was collected through a driver-centric study involving human drivers encountering twelve simulated accident scenarios. This dataset fills a critical gap in human-centric driving data for rare events involving interactions with autonomous vehicles. It enables autonomous systems to better react to human drivers and optimize trajectory prediction in mixed autonomy environments involving both human-driven and self-driving cars. In addition, individual driving behaviors are classified through a set of standardized questionnaires, carefully designed to identify and categorize driving behavior traits. We correlate data features with driving behaviors, showing that the simulated environment reflects real-world driving styles. DISC is the first dataset to capture how various driving styles respond to accident scenarios, offering significant potential to enhance autonomous vehicle safety and driving behavior analysis in mixed autonomy environments.

In recent years, autonomous vehicles (AVs) have gained significant attention due to their potential to reduce traffic fatalities. The widespread adoption of AV technology is contingent not only on technical performance but also on public trust, with concerns centering on safety and potential technological malfunctions [1, 2]. A key factor in improving trust in autonomous systems is the ability to understand and replicate human driving behavior. However, worldwide, road accidents cause over 1.19 million deaths annually, with a majority resulting from human error [3], hence following human driving pattern is not always desired. Since the majority of accidents are caused by human error, analyzing human driving data allows us to identify common mistakes and undesirable driving patterns. This understanding is crucial for training machine learning models, such as those used in behavior cloning, where the goal is to mimic human driving behavior. Identifying undesirable driving patterns is especially useful for achieving a defensive driving behavior, which is proven to play a significant role in increasing passenger comfort and trust in AVs [4].

This paper presents a novel approach to modeling human driving behavior, designed for use in evaluating autonomous vehicle control systems in a simulation environments. Our methodology leverages a hierarchical forward-looking, risk-aware estimation framework with learned parameters to generate human-like driving trajectories, accommodating multiple driver levels determined by model parameters. This approach is grounded in multimodal trajectory prediction, using a deep neural network with LSTM-based social pooling to predict the trajectories of surrounding vehicles. These trajectories are used to compute forward-looking risk assessments along the ego vehicle's path, guiding its navigation. Our method aims to replicate human driving behaviors by learning parameters that emulate human decision-making during driving. We ensure that our model exhibits robust generalization capabilities by conducting simulations, employing real-world driving data to validate the accuracy of our approach in modeling human behavior. The results reveal that our model effectively captures human behavior, showcasing its versatility in modeling human drivers in diverse highway scenarios.

Building simulation environments for developing and testing autonomous vehicles necessitates that the simulators accurately model the statistical realism of the real-world environment, including the interaction with other vehicles driven by human drivers. To address this requirement, an accurate human behavior model is essential to incorporate the diversity and consistency of human driving behavior. We propose a mathematical framework for designing a data-driven simulation model that simulates human driving behavior more realistically than the currently used physics-based simulation models. Experiments conducted using the NGSIM dataset validate our hypothesis regarding the necessity of considering the complexity, diversity, and consistency of human driving behavior when aiming to develop realistic simulators.

Microscopic traffic simulators are powerful tools for transportation engineers and planners to analyze and predict the impact of microscopic adjustments on traffic patterns without disrupting real-world traffic. For example, it can help analyze how changing road shape like replacing an intersection with a roundabout affects traffic patterns [1], and develop traffic-aware autonomous driving policies that enhance overall traffic efficiency [2, 3]. However, creating a realistic simulator that can simultaneously replicate the microscopic response of human drivers to traffic conditions and the resulting long-term macroscopic statistics is a challenging task. In recent years, there have been significant efforts to develop realistic traffic simulators that accurately model human driving behavior. Traditional traffic simulators, such as SUMO [4], AIMSUN [5], and MITSIM [6], typically rely on heuristic car-following models like the Intelligent Driver Model (IDM) [7]. However, despite careful calibration of parameters, these simplified, rulebased models often fail to deliver accurate simulations [8] due to the complexity of real-world traffic environments.

While there has been an increasing focus on the use of game theoretic models for autonomous driving, empirical evidence shows that there are still open questions around dealing with the challenges of common knowledge assumptions as well as modeling bounded rationality. To address some of these practical challenges, we develop a framework of generalized dynamic cognitive hierarchy for both modelling naturalistic human driving behavior as well as behavior planning for autonomous vehicles (AV). This framework is built upon a rich model of level-0 behavior through the use of automata strategies, an interpretable notion of bounded rationality through safety and maneuver satisficing, and a robust response for planning. Based on evaluation on two large naturalistic datasets as well as simulation of critical traffic scenarios, we show that i) automata strategies are well suited for level-0 behavior in a dynamic level-k framework, and ii) the proposed robust response to a heterogeneous population of strategic and non-strategic reasoners can be an effective approach for game theoretic planning in AV.

Understanding human driving behaviors quantitatively is critical even in the era when connected and autonomous vehicles and smart infrastructure are becoming ever more prevalent. This is particularly so as that mixed traffic settings, where autonomous vehicles and human driven vehicles co-exist, are expected to persist for quite some time. Towards this end it is necessary that we have a comprehensive modeling framework for decision-making within which human driving preferences can be inferred statistically from observed driving behaviors in realistic and naturalistic traffic settings. Leveraging a recently proposed computational framework for smart vehicles in a smart world using multi-agent based simulation and optimization, we first recapitulate how the forward problem of driving decision-making is modeled as a state space model. We then show how the model can be inverted to estimate driver preferences from naturalistic traffic data using the standard Kalman filter technique. We explicitly illustrate our approach using the vehicle trajectory data from Sugiyama experiment that was originally meant to demonstrate how stop-and-go shockwave can arise spontaneously without bottlenecks. Not only the estimated state filter can fit the observed data well for each individual vehicle, the inferred utility functions can also re-produce quantitatively similar pattern of the observed collective behaviors. One distinct advantage of our approach is the drastically reduced computational burden. This is possible because our forward model treats driving decision process, which is intrinsically dynamic with multi-agent interactions, as a sequence of independent static optimization problems contingent on the state with a finite look ahead anticipation. Consequently we can practically sidestep solving an interacting dynamic inversion problem that would have been much more computationally demanding.

One researcher is putting real humans into computerized driving simulations to help self-driving cars learn human behavior. In the not-too-distant future, Americans will be sharing the road with self-driving cars. Companies are pouring billions of dollars into developing self-driving vehicles. Waymo, formerly the Google self-driving-car project, says that its self-driving cars have already driven millions of miles on the open road. Stanford University assistant professor Dorsa Sadigh has ridden in self-driving cars.